This series presents an intriguing pattern. Let’s break it down:
- The first number is 2.
- The second number is 4, which is 2 + 2.
- The third number is 6, which is 4 + 2.
- The fourth number is 9, which is 6 + 3.
- The fifth number is 6, which seems to be a reset.
- The sixth number is 14, which is 6 + 8.
- The seventh number is again 6.
If we observe the pattern, after every two additions, we have a number that seems to reset to 6. The additions are +2, +2, +3, and +8 in sequence. Following this logic, after the last 6, we might expect another increment.
If we assume a potential continuation of this increment sequence after another reset, one could speculate a numeric increase based on prior jumps. However, since there are repeated instances of 6 in between, maintaining this reset tendency could suggest the next number should likely follow the last increment, as there may be a play on expected increases.
Therefore, if continuing the increment pattern after expecting another reset but maintaining proximity to the average increment trend, while tricky, one might argue for the continuation with 6 itself, supporting its repetitive nature. So, the number that logically follows in a conventional sequence interpretation could likely be 6 once more given the established patterns.