In the historical novel ‘Blood on the River: James Town 1607’ by Elisa Carbone, conflict is a central theme that drives the narrative forward. The story encapsulates various forms of conflict, including man vs. man, man vs. nature, and man vs. self.
The most prominent conflict arises between the characters of Samuel Collier, our protagonist, and the various figures of authority in the colony, particularly Captain Smith and the antagonistic forces that represent greed and power struggles amongst the settlers.
Samuel Collier, a young boy who serves as the page to Captain John Smith, is thrust into this turbulent environment filled with competing interests and survival challenges. He embodies growth and resilience as he learns to navigate the complexities of life in the Jamestown settlement. His journey represents the struggle for identity and morality in the face of harsh realities.
On the other hand, the antagonists in the story can be viewed both as individual characters, like the greedy and selfish settlers who prioritize personal gain over community well-being, and as the broader conflict with the Native American tribes who are portrayed with initial hostility and mistrust due to the settlers’ encroachment on their land. These antagonistic forces create tension and challenges for Samuel and his companions, highlighting the conflict inherent in colonization.
Ultimately, ‘Blood on the River’ illustrates the conflicts faced by its characters in their quest for survival, belonging, and moral integrity. This layered portrayal of conflict enriches the narrative, making it a compelling read for those interested in the historical complexities of early American history.